Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using computer.do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, the proliferation of computer usage is changing our society and our lives markedly, and as a result, more and more people have the opinion that public museums and art galleries should be replaced by computers. Personally, I do not agree with that and I think the public museums and art galleries are still a crucial part in life.
We should not deny that the computer is a convenience. We can use it to see historical objects and works at home, any time we like. Furthermore, not considering the cost of electricity, it is free for us, consequently, we will save a lot of money.
Despite the large number of advantages in using a computer to see historical objects and works, the benefits of public museums and art galleries can not be ignored. We can go to public museums and art galleries to see the historical objects and works with our own eyes, due to this, we will feel the historical objects and works in depth, it can especially create a sense of the art.
Public museums and art galleries also play a key role in a city’s culture. A city which is rich in culture will be attractive for tourists who will also promote the city’s economy. Take London for example, the vast number of public museums and art galleries is a major reason why there are so many tourists every year.
It is clear that the influence of computer in historical objects and works has been increasing, but public museums and art galleries still have their own place. Both have their benefits in showing the historical objects and works.
Recent Comments